Home

Advertisement

I did that once... [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Sarah

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

More thoughts on FA [May. 22nd, 2009|12:25 am]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Mood | frustrated]

I've had a few people ask me why I've been so adamant and almost militant about my Fat Acceptance postings and comments on Facebook.  Aside from the cliches of the unenlightened ("BUT ZOMFG TEH FATZ IZ DEADLY!!11one"), a lot of people seem to be genuinely curious about WHAT FA entails and why I gear it towards women in particular.   Because I enjoy lists, here goes.

<b>1) Women are held to a higher standard of physical beauty than men.</b>  Don't believe me?  Quickly, name three male actors who don't fit the "traditional" standard of physical attractiveness.  Got it?  Now name three female actors who don't, not including those whose careers are based off this supposed lack of attractiveness (i.e. Nikki Blonsky).  It's harder, isn't it?  And let's not forget the always-popular Susan Boyle from "Britain's Got Talent."  Her success is BASED UPON the fact that she breaks through these barriers of attractiveness.  Just look at the faces of the people in the audience before she sings... they EXPECT her to fail, they WANT her to fail.  However, their tunes change when she shows her vocal chops.  If she were a Britney lookalike, the expectation for failure would not have been there, plain and simple.  There is a cultural assumption that talent and success is reserved for the physically attractive.

<b>2) Thin =  attractive in the American cultural lexicon.</b>  Every time a female celebrity gains weight, you can just hear the tabloids orgasming from the headlines they can derive (this will happen occasionally to men, it's just not as common).  Even when a celebrity looks BETTER with meat on her bones (Carrie Underwood, anyone?), the assumption from the mass media still claims that ANY weight gain is bad.  The headlines on People magazine make it seem as though said celebrity burned off half her body, Twoface-style, in a deliberate effort to be unattractive.  Jessica Simpson recently fell under this public scrutiny for gaining something resembling 10 lbs.  Upon further research (great job there, journalists of the world), it was discovered that to keep her Daisy Duke body, she had to do more than an hour of exercise every day, six days a week, AND keep a highly restricted diet.  In other words, she kept in shape but LET HER BODY DO WHAT IT NATURALLY DOES, and was thrown under the bus for it.  By the way, the diet industry is a MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR INDUSTRY.  Given that DIETS DON'T WORK (95-98% of dieters lossing over 75 lbs. regain it within 5 years...this is a solid fact, you can google it), is it any wonder?  Women all over the world pay for body shame.

<b>3) Mass Media is all media.</b>  More people voted for American Idol this year than in the presidential election, even when you control for multiple voting.  Fucking think about that.

<b>4) Women's bodies are not our own.</b>  This is the hardest concept for most people to grasp.  How can our bodies not be our own?  Think about the big-breasted girl in high school who was subjected to verbal assaults because she DARED to have big breasts.  Think about the transwomen in New York City who have beer bottles thrown at them for dressing as they choose.  Think about the fat woman who is subject to stares from those around her in the grocery store checkout because she has food in her cart, regardless of its health content.  Think about the 16-year-old girl denied an abortion, not on religious grounds, but on the grounds that she, despite BEING PHYSICALLY PREGNANT cannot "make her own decisions."  Women's bodies are subject to public scrutiny everywhere, all the time.  We are supposed to fit into a mold of femininity straight out of the 1950's (demure, quiet, small waist, big breasts-- but not too big, hourglass figure, perfect hair, perfect skin, etc. etc.), and when we break this mold, we're "bitches," "sluts," "tramps," "whores," and the ever-popular "dykes," and "cunts."

<b>5) Men have it shitty, too.</b>  Although not always held to the same physical standard, men are held to a standard of hypermasculinity.  I can't begin to comprehend the subtle intricacies of the masculine-feminine battle that happens within the male sphere (and I'm not being sarcastic), bit I do understand that it occurs.  There is a rejection of all that is feminine in this hypermasculine culture, which is where the homophobia present in many adolescent male cliques comes from.  Anything other than straight-up heterosexuality (lulz pun) means a deviation from this norm, and is therefore "bad" and/or "wrong."

<b>6) When everyone loses at society, we have to re-evaluate our values.</b>  There is no reason for the fat-hatred and other-hatred that is so omnipresent in American culture.  I know I say this a lot, but there are fucking wars going on, genocides and mass murders and disease and technological revolutions.  Until we stop focusing on outward appearances, shit ain't gettin' done.


My sincerest love to all of you.  I'm sorry if some of these points don't make sense or mesh with my "thesis."  I'm rill tired.  These are more talking points to get you thinking about how you evaluate yourselves/others and whether you are a victim to our culture.  As always, YOU ARE ALL PERFECT THE WAY GOD/ALLAH/BUDDHA/VISHNU/XENU MADE YOU!

Peace, Love, and Persephone's Belly,

Sarah
LinkLeave a comment

What is a Feminist? [Mar. 17th, 2009|11:04 pm]
[Tags|]

A feminist has big boobs. A feminist has small boobs. A feminist has medium-sized boobs or one that's bigger than the other.

A feminist has brown hair or blond hair or red hair or black hair or racially Black hair or no hair or hair of strange colors. A feminist has brown, blue, black, green, hazel, gray, and any combination thereof for eyes.

A feminist is short, tall, fat, skinny, in-between, anorexic, bulimic, binge-eating, nutritious, vegan, carniverous, lacto-ovo, kosher, and allergic to all kinds of foods.

A feminist is Black, White, Asian, Hispanic, Middle-Eastern, Indian, Pacific, Native American, Eskimo, mixed, Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, Taoist, Baha'i, Agnostic, Atheist, Humanist, Deist, male, female, transgendered, gay, straight, bisexual, asexual, questioning, left-handed, right-handed, ambidextrous, without hands, without arms, without one or both legs.

The truth is, if you believe that women and men are equal in potential, you are a feminist. End of story. And no one should believe otherwise.
LinkLeave a comment

Hollywood Ugly is not Real Ugly [Mar. 17th, 2009|10:51 pm]
[Tags|]
[Current Mood | blank]

I'm watching "The Princess Diaries" right now, and although I love this movie, I have to say that I am perpetually offended by the notion that Mia's initial look is somehow "ugly." Probably because I possess the same look. Curly, frizzy hair; thick glasses; bushy eyebrows: this isn't ugly, it's normal. And regardless of the amount of bad extensions and fake glasses, you cannot hide the fact that the actress is still Anne Hathaway. She will ALWAYS be beautiful. What bothers me most is that the hairdresser character physically breaks her glasses. Even if Mia DOES wear contacts, she still needs her glasses for the trip from the bathroom to the bed, etc. Symbolically, he not only breaks her glasses, he breaks her as a person. It's not different than "Taming of the Shrew" inasmuch as one male character (why are they always men?) turns a female character into a more socially optimal version of herself.

The point is, unless we, as a society, accept that beauty comes in all shapes and sizes and forms, it will keep shrinking until no one else will fit. I think we have all felt as though our looks just don't cut it by today's standards (I know I do frequently). It's not right. You are all beautiful in your own right, even if you don't fit into the Playboy Centerfold standard.

I'll write it again. YOU ARE PERFECT JUST THE WAY YOU ARE. Frizzy hair, bad vision, bad eyebrows, bad skin, weak ankles, dry elbows, wide hips, WHATEVER. God (or Allah or Buddha or Vishnu or whatever) wouldn't have made you as you are if not for a reason.

Peace, Love, and Fluffy Puppies,

Sarah
LinkLeave a comment

The Travesty of Customer Service [Jun. 22nd, 2008|01:05 am]
[Tags|]

Last night, I made a late-night outing to a certain Ohio-based grocery store that shall remain nameless. What should have been a fifteen-minute errand turned into a rage-inducing fight for a box of cotton swabs that undermined my faith in humanity. Standing at the self-checkout line, I was left stranded when a group of barely-legal, undertrained and overstaffed workers failed to recognize that my machine (and mine alone, as is my luck) has chosen to cease functioning. While this inaction is hardly in and of itself the epic destruction of customer service, it serves as the proverbial cherry on top of the ice cream sundae that is the travesty of customer service.

It's not just the low-price grocery stores that have fallen victim to this epidemic, however. It seems as though every store I visit tries harder and harder to equip itself with the least competent and most Anglophobic workers. It's hard enough to find the right hammer in the hardware store, let alone when the sales associate who should be helping you neither possesses a basic understanding of the store's merchandise nor understands your question when spoken in plain language. I would even accept such a gross underestimation of personnel if the employees at any given store would obey the cardinal rule of retail, smile and find someone who knows the answer. Unfortunately, the majority of them seem so engrossed with their mediocrity that even calling a manager to help the customer is completely out of the question.

Perhaps my view of this debacle of customer service stems from my frustration with the job market. I am a high school graduate, currently in college, with a background in retail. Yet, day after day, my qualifications are passed over in the job market in favor of someone who will work half as hard for a wage half a cent below my asking price. What retailers far and wide seem to misunderstand is just how far customer service goes. An employee who perhaps fumbles on his or her understanding of the store's layout can make up for such an error with a smile, an apology, and a quick correction of the error. A warm demeanor, when coupled with retail knowledge and expertise sends sales through the roof.

I guess it all boils down to the old adage, "You get what you pay for." For low, low prices, consumers have to expect customer service to falter on par with the Roman Empire. But for now, I'll be taking my business to the other grocery store down the street. My blood pressure deserves that.
LinkLeave a comment

Female Liberation, Bitches [Apr. 12th, 2008|03:58 pm]
[Tags|]

This has been bugging me for a while, so I thought I'd verbalize (textualize?) it.

It's no secret that there is a double standard for male and female actions. But the more I think about it, the more outraged I am by what I will heretofore deem the "triple standard."

The media wants to put women into two categories, and only two: Virgins and
Sluts.

You are a Virgin if you choose to wait for sex, wear modest clothing, and shy away from jumping headfirst into relationships. In other words, you're a Charlotte. But, Virgins also don't drink, smoke, do drugs, sleep late, or get bad grades. They are chaste and perfect in every sense of the words.

On the other hand, Sluts perform each and every sex act ever known to mankind on a nightly basis. They wear revealing clothing and enjoy their bodies. They fulfill whatever base desires they feel without hesitation. They get abortions and STD's. Samantha, to continue with that motif.

Obviously no woman can be either a Virgin or a Slut. Like everything, each woman is a particular shade of gray between the two extremes.

Now, here's where it gets complicated:

According to American society, you have to be both a Virgin and a Slut. You have to abstain from sex until marriage, but put out on the first date. You have to party every night, but only if you're single and 21. You have to be in a relationship, but also not. You have to know the entire Kama Sutra by heart, but never have had sex of any sort. You have to be a nymphomaniac, but also pure and chaste.

Is it any wonder we're so confused?
LinkLeave a comment

Taking Back the Republican Party [Feb. 1st, 2008|11:07 am]
[Tags|, ]

I am a Republican. However, I am not the breed of Conservative you might expect. I am not a fundamentalist Christian. In fact, I’m not even Christian; I’m Jewish. I don’t believe in legislating morality. I went to a public high school where I learned about (gasp) sex, and how to have it safely. I don’t believe in saving sex until marriage. I believe that consenting adults may do whatever they want in their own bedrooms, regardless of what the Ann Coulters of the world say. I believe that, if a woman chooses to have an abortion, she has that right. I believe in personal responsibility.

I believe in laissez-faire economics and social policy. I believe in legalized abortion, drugs, and gay marriage. My best male friend is gay, and I don’t intend to convert him to heterosexuality. I believe that he was born homosexual, and will continue to be homosexual for the rest of his life. I believe that he has a right to fall in love and marry whomever he desires. I believe that the Jennifer Lopez has the right to divorce as many times as she likes. I don’t believe that the institution of marriage is under fire. I believe that people need to think before they marry. But, if they don’t, I believe that they have that right. I believe in personal rights.

I believe in little to no taxes. I believe in a strong private sector. I believe that Donald Trump is rich for a reason, and that he should be able to retain his wealth and do with it what he desires. I believe that, with minimal government aid, the terminally impoverished should be able to rid themselves of their poverty. I believe that people who subsist entirely on government support and never look for work are a strain on the economy. But I believe that they have the right to be a strain on the economy if they so desire.

I believe that crime is a choice. I believe that those who choose to violate the law should be punished, regardless of whether or not I agree with the law. I believe in sterilization for those who commit rape and sexual assault. I believe that punishment should fit the crime. I don’t believe in torture. I believe that torture, no matter what the motive, blurs the line between humans and pigs, to put it in Orwellian terms.

I believe that I have the right not to eat meat, just as others have the right to do as such. I believe that hunting is cruel, but will fight for someone’s right to do it. I believe in spaying and neutering my pets, and adopting them from shelters. I believe that my pets have souls. I believe that children who abuse animals will grow up to be adults that abuse people. I believe in punishment for juvenile crime.

For too long, the Conservative movement has been hijacked by the Sean Hannitys and the Rush Limbaughs of the world. It is time for Republicans like myself to take back the party. Conservatism is not about bombing abortion clinics or converting gays. It is about fiscal and social responsibility. It is about low taxes and high faith in the Constitution. This is the textbook definition of a Conservative. I am taking back the Republican Party, one person at a time.

This is what I believe.
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]

Advertisement